Follow me in twitter

Our Tweets will appear shortly.

Relation to Old Testament Part 2

Blogon December 3rd, 20101 Comment

Jesus’ Examples of Fulfilling the Law – Matthew 5:21-47

With an unmatched authority, Jesus has made Himself the pivotal point of the history of humankind. The Old Testament pointed toward Him, and now, in His Person, the Kingdom of God has arrived and shows how the Old Testament teaching is validated and has continuity in Himself and His teaching.

Jesus illustrates the concept of the righteousness that surpasses that of the Pharisees through six examples that are presented in form of a contrast between what “was said” and Jesus’ own more demanding ethics. The formula with which Jesus’ demand is made is a constant, “But I tell you.” It is important to observe that Jesus did not contrast what He said with what the Old Testament “has said”; Jesus contrasted His sayings with what “it was said,” perhaps by the Pharisees and the teachers of the Law, as understood by them through their human tradition.

Murder, Anger, and Reconciliation – Matthew 5:21-26

“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment’.” The explicit Old Testament command was the sixth of the Ten Commandments. Those who took a person’s life were to appear before a court and judged.  However, in verse 22, Jesus reveals an important principle: the actual committing of murder is only the outward manifestation of an inward attitude which is itself culpable, whether or not it actually issues in the act of murder. “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, ‘Raca,’ [an Aramaic term of contempt =’stupid’] is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.”

This is an unusually strong statement, claiming that those guilty of despising anger are guilty enough to go to Hell! In other words, Jesus Hehhhrelates anger with murder, and we need to let His words sink in and impact our conscience. Some commentators discern an ascending scale of severity in the description of different levels of anger, from a non-specific “judgment,” to the more specific trial by the Sanhedrin, to the final extreme of “hellfire” (R.T. France, The Gospel of Matthew, 200). But the clear understanding from Jesus’ words is that ordinary insults betray an attitude of contempt which God takes extremely serious. The effect of the saying is to be found not in one’s individual offenses and the assigned punishment to them, but in the cumulative rhetorical force of a series of daily scenes, attitudes, and expressions that affect the inner person.

Some may say that Jesus Himself got very angry in certain occasions, and He called the Pharisees, “You blind fools” (Matt.23:17). He also was “angry” with those contesting His right to heal on the Sabbath day (Mark 3:5), but He was driven by a “righteous anger” that can be only possessed by a righteous God! Only a perfect and sinless being like Jesus was in the position to experience this form of “sinless” anger against sin, injustice, and hypocritical religiosity. But He never reacted in self-defense, when He was mocked, insulted, and injured: “When they hurled their insults at Him, He did not retaliate; when He suffered, He made no threats. Instead, He entrusted Himself to Him who judges justly” (1 Peter 2:23).

In this passage Jesus teaches against unrighteous anger: we are quick to get angry when we are personally affronted and offended, and slow to be angry when sin and injustice takes place around us. This unrighteous anger affects our relationships “with our brother” and many times has its source in a sense of personal superiority towards others. Jesus teaches us to purge ourselves of any thought of superiority that leads one to devaluate others. In God’s eyes all humans are precious, as precious as the blood of His beloved Son, Jesus.

In verse 23 Jesus brings in discussion the person who comes before God to perform his religious duty but who has offended his brother. Jesus insists it is more important to be reconciled with his brother than that he discharges his religious duty: forget the worship service and pursue reconciliation, and only then worship God! Men have a tendency to substitute ceremony for integrity, purity, and love, but Jesus cannot accept that. Ceremony, regular attendance, and giving will never produce a clear conscience! We need to strive to make things right.

Further, Jesus talks about one who defaults on his debts, which back in those days could be thrown in a debtors’ prison until the debt was paid in full. And, of course, while in prison they could not work, and their debt would remain unpaid! Jesus’ point is that judgment is looming and justice will be done. Personal conflicts can often be resolved if dealt with quickly. But if we just put off dealing with them, the older they get, the bitterer we become!

If we have Christ’s righteousness, we will not only refrain from the shedding of blood but will develop hearts that are liberated from the things that are the cause of murder, namely, contemptuous anger. We will be sensitive about our attitude toward others. And when we are guilty of offending another, let’s decide now that we will confess our sin to those whom we offended. Reconciliation is the key that opens the heavens and grants us access to God!

Adultery and Purity – Matthew 5:27-30

The basic treatment of the Seventh commandment in verses 27-28, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart,” is in principle the same as that of the sixth (vv. 21-22): the visible and punishable act of adultery forbidden by the commandment is only the outward expression of an inward desire which is, in this case, adultery “in the heart” – and therefore liable to the same punishment (which was also death).

Our society came a long way from the explicit prohibition on adultery. As of 2005, approximately 5 million couples / 10 million individuals were cohabitating in the USA. Many modern thinkers affirm then legitimacy of adultery, if there is consensual love. However, as our society, often mockingly, moves away from the seventh commandment, Jesus moves in the opposite direction: He is not content with merely a formal adherence to it. Rather, on His own authority He is underscoring the purity of the heart toward which this law points. By labeling lust adultery, Jesus has deepened the seventh commandment in terms of the tenth, the commandment against covetousness.

This is not a prohibition of the normal attraction which exists between young, unmarried men and women; it is the deep-seated lust which consumes and devours from within, the imagination that attacks and rapes, which mentally contemplates and commits adultery. Mental infidelity leaves one completely guilty. For the Christian man, it is not the first, casual look at a woman; it is the second look that swells with lust and feeds his imagination. Jesus knows well the human heart and He puts His finger on the problem: sexual sin is always preceded by sensual fantasies! Just think of King David and Bath-Sheba… We, men, could all ask, not without shame, “Which one of us is not an adulterer?” It is indeed a constant battle with our eyes, with our hearts, and with our thoughts!

What we all need is the attitude described by Jesus in 5:29-30, “If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.” Some have taken this language literally, like Origen (195-254), who castrated himself so that he would not be tempted. But that misses Jesus’ point, because if I gouge my right eye, I would still be looking and lusting using my left eye. Even blind, a twisted mind can still mentally sin!

What Jesus taught is what is called “spiritual mortification.” John Stott explains, “If your eye causes you to sin, because temptation comes to you through your eyes, then pluck out your eyes. That is, don’t look! Behave as if you actually plucked out your eyes and flung them away… If your hand or foot causes you to sin, because temptation comes to you through your hands (things you do) or your feet (places you visit), then cut them off. That is: don’t do it! Don’t go! Behave as you … were now crippled and so you could not do the things or visit the places which previously caused you to sin.” (Sermon on the Mount, 89)

Jesus is telling us that anything that stands between us and Him must be torn out or cut off and thrown away. These are drastic measures but absolutely needed to protect our spiritual health. Half-baked measures will not do the job. A wise man or woman will appropriate Job’s approach as he explained in Job 31:1, 7, 9. But above everything else, we must recognize the absolute necessity of the Holy Spirit, without whom we cannot mortify our flesh (Cols 3:5). Willpower alone will not do the job: Romans 8:13 reminds us that God gave us the ultimate power in this universe to help us pursue His holiness.

The Relation of the Kingdom of God to the Old Testament

Blogon October 18th, 20101 Comment

Matthew 5:17-47

As we are taking on the section of Matthew 5:17-47, we must observe two things: First, we are entering the body of the great Sermon; Second, Jesus is making a clear effort in showing how His teaching relates to the Old Testament. It is obvious from His last beatitude that those who practice the norms of the Kingdom would enjoy great rewards in heavens and will align themselves, even in suffering, with the prophets (5:12).

Jesus Is the Fulfillment of the Old Testament – Matthew 5:17-20

This short passage is one of the most difficult texts in the whole Bible. From the reading of this section becomes clear that Jesus had a high view and esteem for the Old Testament Scriptures and He states that He did not come to abolish them; actually He emphasized their immutability down to the smallest letter of the Hebrew alphabet. In other words, Jesus doesn’t say that the Old Testament writings contain some partial truth; in John 10:35 He declared that, “the Scripture cannot be broken.”

These observations though, may create difficulties regarding the application of the Old Testament Scriptures to the life of the New Testament believer. For instance, it seems pretty clear that Jesus abolished the food laws (Mark 7:19), even though He declared that, “I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them”! Further, after Jesus’ death and resurrection, the New Testament writers clearly announced that the sacrificial system of the Old Testament was no longer necessary (Heb. 8:13; 10:1-18). Also, why Christians are not following the details of the Old Testament Laws?

Some Bible commentators (going back to Thomas Aquinas – 1225 – 1274) have attempted to divide the law in three categories: moral, civil, and ceremonial, saying that the civil law has passed because the people of Israel was not formed as a nation for many centuries; the ceremonial law has disappeared because it pointed toward Jesus, who “fulfilled” it by dying on the cross, thus annulling all the Old Testament ceremonies. They continue to argue that the only law that that Jesus was referring in this passage is the eternal, never-changing moral law.

But this division of the Law is highly artificial as the laws are intermixed and difficult to categorize. For instance, the Ten Commandments, the clearest examples of so-called moral laws, present problems for the moral, civil, and ceremonial distinctions. For example is the Sabbath law moral or ceremonial? If content is the criterion, then the Sabbath law, which was clearly part of Israel’s worship system, is a ceremonial law and not a moral one. Furthermore, although many Christians claim that the Sabbath law is a moral law, practically none of them obey it. Going to church on Sunday, the first day of the week, can hardly be called obedience to the Sabbath law. Moses would not have accepted the first day of the week as a substitute for the seventh day. So there must be a different explanation to the Jesus’ words in this passage.

In Matthew 11:12-13, Jesus declares, “From the days of John the Baptist until now, the Kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it. For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John.” In other words, the whole Old Testament had a prophetic function pointing toward the coming Messiah, and Jesus came to fulfill the Old Testament. The New Testament interprets the Old as pointing forward to Christ and all the blessings He was to bring. The sacrificial system pointed toward Jesus’ sacrifice (Heb. 9:8) and, as he explained to Cleopas and his friend, “Everything must be fulfilled that is written about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.” (Luke 24:44).  “The Scriptures testify about Me,” Jesus said (John 5:39).

Moving the discussion back to the Kingdom matters (v.19), Jesus brings back the Norms of the Kingdom in sight. To enter the Kingdom is required a righteousness that surpasses that of the Pharisees, that was based on self-effort; this new righteousness is based to one’s obedience to the King. Even ranking within the Kingdom will be based on obedience to the Jesus’ commands (5:19). The righteousness Jesus was speaking about was of a prophetic nuance: “But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify” (Romans 3:21).

The Cost of Discipleship by Dietrich Bonhoeffer

http://www.amazon.com/Cost-Discipleship-Dietrich-Bonhoeffer/dp/0684815001

Studies in the Sermon on the Mount by David Martyn Lloyd-Jones

http://www.amazon.com/Studies-Sermon-Mount-Martyn-Lloyd-Jones/dp/080280036X/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1284124840&sr=1-2